Rigorous and transparent systematic reviews are recognized internationally as a credible source for evidence of effectiveness. However, in the field of nutrition, despite attempts at developing consensus on actions and interventions to reduce undernutrition and micronutrient deficiencies, there is lack of coordination among various groups. Each of these methodological choices influences the findings of the reviews, and lack of standardization across these domains increases the complexity for users of systematic reviews in interpreting results. There is a need to develop a consensus on methodologies for nutrition reviews, criteria for assessing the evidence and possibly facilitating development and collation of the evidence in the subject area.

http://www.biomedcentral.com/2055-0928/1/9

References

  1. Gillespie S, Haddad L, Mannar V, Menon P, Nisbett N. The politics of reducing malnutrition: building commitment and accelerating progress. Lancet. 2013;382(9891):552

    69.

  2. WHO. Use of systematic reviews of the evidence in public health nutrition. Proceedings of an informal consultation held 18 October 2011 in Geneva,Switzerland. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85792/1/9789241506038_eng.pdf.

  3. Shea B, Grimshaw J, Wells G, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7(1):10.

Reply

Please Sign in (or Register) to view further.